Maynard asked whether the ad made for the Photo Press was any more impartial than the letter to the editor that previously ran in the Sentinel. Martens said, “we had been turned down by various people to speak for various reasons and to explain the charter amendments and what the charter was working on, we did this (the ad).” Zarling said that if three members can make decisions alone, the rest of the group wouldn’t be needed at any more meetings. There was nothing under the carpet here,” Katzenmeyer said. It’s got nothing to do with management or authorization of the Charter Commission, which is the issue we’re talking about,” Zarling said. “What this is talking about, is this is what the Charter Commission should address as you’re establishing the charter. Zarling said that what Katzenmeyer referenced had nothing to do with the Charter Commission, but was referring to the City Administrator. In turn, Katzenmeyer read another section that said: “Whenever possible, the charter should centralize responsibility for administration in one person….” “That is exactly the purpose of that ad,” Maynard said. “So you’re saying the commission doesn’t have to approve it?… You three have the ability to commit the commission to expenditures of that size?” Zarling asked.Ĭommission Member Terry Anderson made a brusque motion to “accept Katzenmeyer’s proposal of what he’s done and that the bills be paid.” Martens seconded it.Ĭommissioner Member Jay Maynard asked the members present to look up a section in the League of Minnesota Cities handbook that read: “Charter Commission should keep in mind that the use of public funds to promote a particular election outcome may be questionable.” Katzenmeyer said time was of the essence. “Isn’t this group supposed to have a say in that?” Zarling said. “Based on that, we need to take a request back to the city council, one that we made earlier, to increase the fund for Charter Commission expenditures,” Katzenmeyer said.Ĭommission Member Jim Zarling asked whether expenditures like that should be made and approved by the entire group. On Tuesday Katzenmeyer said that the remaining $700 went toward the ad and that he made out a personal check for the remaining amount so that the ad could be printed. 13 Fairmont City Council meeting, the council considered a request for an additional $2,500 for the Charter Commission to support its ongoing work. The Charter Commission budget has been a recent topic among both that commission and the Fairmont City Council. “Under the current budget for the Charter Commission, we had $700 remaining,” Katzenmeyer said. He shared that the cost of the ad was $1,075 and the professional make-up of the ad was $90 for a total of $1,165. We also had Ad Manufacturing do the professional layout and submission to the Photo Press, which will be in (today),” Katzenmeyer said. “It is, in our opinion, informational in nature. Following that, Katzenmeyer said he, Martens and member Chuck Omvig got together and put together an ad with information on the charter amendments that will appear on the ballot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |